‘Bengal is not different from the country…’, SC sends notice to Tamil Nadu and Mamta government on ‘The Kerala Story’ ban
[ad_1]
Senior advocate Harish Salve appeared on behalf of the filmmakers in the court on Friday. While senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi was present in the court on behalf of the West Bengal government. Harish Salve told the court that West Bengal has banned the film, while in Tamil Nadu, the Cinematograph Act prohibits the screening of the film due to security reasons. On this, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, arguing on behalf of the state, said that we have received a large number of intelligence reports. And earlier in a similar case, the Supreme Court had asked to go to the High Court.
CJI said- Is Bengal different from the rest of the country…
After hearing both the sides, the court of CJI DY Chandrachud directed that a short notice be issued to both the states seeking their reply. While commenting, he told Singhvi that this film has been released across the country. In such a situation, is Bengal different from the rest of the country…? Court said that it does not have cinematic value and it can be good or bad.
Kerala High Court had said – the film is against ISIS, not against religion
Significantly, earlier the Kerala High Court had refused to stay the release of the film on May 5. A bench of Justices N Nagresh and Sophie Thomas, after watching the teaser and trailer of the film, decided that there was nothing against Islam or Muslims in the film. Whatever is shown is about the terrorist organization Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
Read further, what happened during the hearing in the Supreme Court on Friday … Jas ka tas:
Harish Salve: My Lord, this is a petition under section 32. One state has banned the film, while another has invoked its powers under the Cinematograph Act. Many of these orders have been cancelled.
CJI DY Chandrachud: We will issue short notice to West Bengal.
CJI: No restrictions in Tamil Nadu?
Harish Salve: This is a real restriction. We demand quashing of this order and seek relief. This state is West Bengal. In Tamil Nadu, we have acknowledged that there are threats being received in cinema halls, due to which the screening of the film has been stopped. That’s why we want instructions for safety.
Abhishek Manu Singhvi: Lordship has said for similar pleas that you should approach the High Court. There is no reason why they cannot go there.
Abhishek Manu Singhvi: We have received a large number of intelligence reports.
CJI: Now Dr. Singhvi’s film has been released in different parts of the country. West Bengal is no different… what if it’s released elsewhere? It operates in other parts of West Bengal with similar population. And it doesn’t have cinematic value, be it good or bad.
CJI: We will not give any stay without hearing the counter argument.
CJI order: Both the states should be issued notices and their answers should be sought. The matter will now be heard on Wednesday.
[ad_2]
Source link