Cheteshwar Pujara On Virat: ‘Shatakahita Sanghacha Jald Gatine Vijay Important’, Cheteshwar Pujaraane Viratla Sunavle
[ad_1]
Pudhari Online Desk: Cheteshwar Pujara, India’s legendary player in Test cricket, i.e. Virat’s famous 48th ODI century-scorer has cast his vote. Punyaat would have been a favorite to face India against Bangladesh in the World Cup 2023. In this match, India achieved its fourth victory in the World Cup after Bangladesh. India would have followed the call of Bangladesh’s 257 runners. Virat Kohli and KL Rahul would have been brilliant. So Virat Kohli should avoid taking 2 singles to complete his century. Viratchya or active Cheteshwar priest is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one. (Cheteshwar Pujara On Virat)
“I wish that Virat Kohli completes a century. But the game is going to happen very soon, it should be remembered. The runrate of your organization is always good. You are currently fighting for the run rate. You don’t want to say ‘Aapne te karu shakalo asato’ when you walk ahead.” Do not say that Cheteshwar Pujarane Mandalay. (Cheteshwar Pujara On Virat)
A section of fans on social media have raised question marks over the decision of rejecting the partnership between Virat Kohli and KL Rahul. Because he made the last 30 attacks. Virat Kohli played 8 dot balls in the last 21 balls of India’s 257 runs at the Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium in Punyatil. (Cheteshwar Pujara On Virat)
Hehi Vachalant’s?
[ad_2]
Source link