Unnecessary controversy over Ramcharitmanas

of the country The freedom fighters fought for the freedom of the country considering it as the goal of Ram Rajya and the framers of the constitution also gave a place to the picture of Ramcharitmanas in the constitution. This thing only shows the falling level of Indian politics.
Creating uproar in the country on the basis of what was said by the sea god in Ramcharitmanas Sunderkand and the attempt made by socialist leader Swami Prasad Maurya and some of his associates to vitiate the social environment, what the minister of Bihar said before that Not only is it sad, but it is also condemnable.
Such activities have been taking place even during the British rule and Mahatma Gandhi had given an explanation at that time. The aim of the British rule was to divide and rule, but today in independent India, dividing the society on the basis of caste and promoting communalism is neither in the interest of the society nor in the interest of the country.

The Uttar Pradesh government has registered an FIR under sections 142, 143, 153A, 295A, 298, 504, 505, 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code against those who burnt copies of the pages of Ramcharitmanas. The quadrilateral that is in dispute is:
‘Lord, even though I have not given you any love. Marzada Puni Tumhari Keenhi..5.
Dhol Ganwar Sudra Pasu Nari. Officer of gross disciplinary action.

Meaning-O Lord! Well done you taught me. But the dignity that remains is also made by you. (The meaning is that this teaching destroys the dignity. The dignity you have tied that remain rooted, do not let anyone down, I brought up this dignity given by you). Dhol, Gawar, Shudra, animal and woman all these deserve to be punished.
I would like to place in front of you the explanation given by Geetapras Gorakhpur in Manas-Piyush regarding the above ‘Chaupai’. The poet has told this cattle from the mouth of the sea. A simple policy and custom has been said in this. This is not an ideal statement, it is a statement of nature. It was not said that shudras, illiterates, animals and women must be beaten. Beating is not said to be a duty. The teacher has the right to chastise the student, but it is only his right. Use that right when you feel the need. It is quite possible that he may not get the opportunity to exercise that right in his lifetime. Rights and duties are not the same. It is necessary to follow the duty, it is mandatory; But the work for which we have the right, we do it only when it is necessary. That’s why, in the context presented, the officers of beating drums etc. have been told. It means that it is not inappropriate to chastise them when necessary. Both the words Ganwar and Shudra are masculine. There is no discrimination between men and women here. All have been declared officers of chastisement. This does not mean that even those who are good should be considered worthy of chastisement. Even among the illiterate and the Shudras, there will be great sages, Mahatmas and people of gentle nature. Amongst the animals there is the Kapila cow and among the women there are innumerable deities who are not worthy of chastisement. Those whose behavior is such that they cannot improve without chastisement, only they will be considered eligible for chastisement; But among Shudras, villagers, cattle and women, there are a large number of people who are entitled to punishment of one kind or the other for education and reform. The word chastisement has come from Laksarth in the sense of punishment for education and correction about other than Dhol. The sense of saying of the ocean is that you did not do anything wrong when you picked up the bow and arrow for my education and to punish me because I am an illiterate, I am entitled to this education. I should have attended your service after hearing of your arrival. You did the right thing by threatening me. Mahatma Gandhi wrote in an article published in Navjeevan that- Commentators have pointed out many faults in Vedas, Bible and Quran too. But the devotees of those books do not experience any faults in them. The examination of each book should be done by looking at the entire book. This is an external exam. The internal examination of the book is done only after seeing what was the effect of a particular book on most of the readers. Why should not be seen by any means, the superiority of Ramayana is proved.… It is definitely a claim for Ramcharitmanas that it has brought peace to lakhs of human beings. Those who were God-fearing have gone before God and are still going today. There is a lot of condemnation of women in Shriramcharitmanas, but through the same book we also get to know about the virtuous character of Sita. How is Ram without Sita? Ram’s fame depends on Sitaji. Sita ji’s not on Ram ji. Kaushalya, Sumitra etc. are also worshipable characters of Manas. The devotion of Shabri and Ahilya is commendable even today. Ravana was a demon but Mandodari was a sati. Many such illustrations can be found in this holy store. In my opinion, all these examples prove that Tulsi Das ji was not a critic of women with knowledge. In terms of knowledge, he was a priest of women only. (From ‘Navjeevan’) My advice to those who have doubts about this relation in their hearts, is not to accept mine or anyone else’s meaning as a mantra. Leave the subject in which the heart is doubtful. Do not accept anything that is opposed to truth and non-violence. To think that Ram Chandra cheated, so we should also cheat, is to read the lesson upside down. Having faith that Ram ji can never cheat, let us meditate on the Purna Purush and study the Purna Granth only. But ‘Sarvarambha hi doshen dhoomenagnirivavrata:’ According to justice, all books are flawed, understanding this, Hanswat should throw out the water in the form of defects and take only milk in the form of virtues. In this way, the separation of merits and demerits, to establish the incomplete as the whole, will always depend on the circumstances of individuals and ages. The independent perfection is only in God and it is inexplicable. (from ‘Navjeevan’)

Mahatma Gandhi wrote this article in Navjivan in 1927, it is relevant even today. Those who are trying to create unnecessary controversies regarding Ramcharitmanas to fulfill their political interests, are walking on the path of suicide. Shriram and Shrikrishna are the central points of the culture and history of this country, whoever has tried to go against them, his political future is not bleak but has ended. Keeping this in mind, those doing politics regarding Ramcharitmanas should introspect and apologize for what they said and did. That would be better for them. Otherwise the law will take its course.

– Irwin Khanna (Chief Editor, Dainik Uttam Hindu)