AI patent cannot be inventor’s, UK Supreme Court gives historic decision
[ad_1]
Creative Commons
His attempt to register a patent was rejected by the UK Intellectual Property Office on the grounds that the inventor must be a human being or a company rather than a machine.
US computer scientists lost their bid to register patents on inventions created by their artificial intelligence systems on Wednesday in Britain in a landmark case over whether AI can own patent rights. Stephen Thaler wants two patents in Britain for inventions he says were created by his Creativity Machine. His attempt to register a patent was rejected by the UK Intellectual Property Office on the grounds that the inventor must be a human being or a company rather than a machine.
Thaler appealed to the UK Supreme Court, which unanimously rejected his appeal on Wednesday because under UK patent law an inventor must be a natural person. Judge David Kitchen said in the court’s written decision that the appeal had nothing to do with the broader question of whether technological advances generated by machines operating autonomously and powered by AI should be patentable. Nor is it concerned with the question whether the meaning of the word ‘inventor’ should be extended.
Includes machines powered by AI that generate new and non-obvious products and processes that can be thought of as providing advantages over products and processes. Which are already known. Thaler’s lawyers said in a statement that the ruling establishes that UK patent law is currently completely unsuitable to protect inventions generated autonomously by AI machines.
other news
[ad_2]
Source link
