India targets China in UN, China protects terrorists of Pakistan, it is the hypocrisy of Dragons to stop them from being blacklisted!

New York: In a veiled attack on China, India said blocking evidence-based resolutions in the UN Security Council to blacklist global terrorists without any justification amounts to “doublespeak” in dealing with the problem. China has in the past saved several Pakistan-based terrorists from being put on the UN backlist.

Ambassador Ruchira, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, said, “Let us turn to the supporting bodies living in the underground world, who have their own custom-made working methods and obscure practices, which cannot be enshrined in the Charter or in any Council resolution. “There is no legal basis to be found.”

Referring to the UNSC’s Sanctions Committee, Kamboj called for introducing the process established at the United Nations, which is not through engaging in dialogue through text or speaking over each other or past each other. . “As threats to international peace and security grow, so too must this Council,” he said. “We call on those blocking progress on this vital issue to focus on demanding real reform and on this council in its 21st year.” to contribute to making it truly suitable for the purposes of the century.”

For example, while we know about these committees’ decisions on listing, decisions to reject listing requests are not made public. This is indeed a hidden veto, but even more an impenetrable veto that really deserves discussion among the broader members,” the Indian envoy to the UN further said.

China is protecting Pakistan based terrorists

Kamboj highlighted that when it comes to the UN Security Council’s commitment to combating the threat of terrorism, “genuine, evidence-based listing proposals for globally accepted terrorists, without giving any good reason, Blocking is unnecessary and smacks of double speak”. This appears to be a veiled attack towards China, which has repeatedly blocked or imposed technical restrictions on India’s bids under the 1267 Al Qaeda Sanctions Committee to blacklist Pakistan-based terrorists and other members of the council. Have supported.

In June last year, China, which has a permanent seat in the UNSC, had blocked India and the US’s proposal to designate Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Sajid Mir, accused of involvement in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. Was wanted for, in which was killed. More than 160 people were designated global terrorists in 2008 under the 1267 Sanctions Committee of the Security Council.

In May 2019, India scored a major diplomatic victory at the United Nations when the global body designated Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar as a “global terrorist”, a decade after New Delhi first designated him The world body was contacted on the issue. Following long standing troubles over China’s veto against the Pakistan-based terrorist.

Kamboj, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, argued that the power to select and decision-making chairpersons of subsidiary bodies should be given through an open process that is intended to be transparent. They said The selection of Chairs of subsidiary bodies and the distribution of PEN holdership should be done through a process that is open, that is transparent, that is based on broad consultation and with a more integrated perspective. The E 10’s consent on chairmen of subsidiary bodies, which are to be assumed by the E 10 itself, must be fully respected by the P 5.

India’s call for reforms

India also reiterated its call for UNSC reforms and asked countries that block amendments to grant permanent seats at the forum to contribute to making the Council fit for the 21st century. Kamboj further said that as an organ of the United Nations tasked with maintaining international peace and security, the debate on the Council’s methods of functioning remains extremely relevant, especially in the backdrop of Ukraine and Gaza.

“So, how much the Security Council has been able to deliver on peace and security, with both feet firmly planted in the past, is a big question that member states need to collectively consider,” he said. ” The UN Security Council has been highly polarized and has failed on several occasions to act on resolutions dealing with the Ukraine and Gaza conflicts due to vetoing by its permanent members such as the US and Russia.

Kamboj further said “We therefore need a Security Council that better reflects contemporary realities – the geographic and developmental diversity of today’s multipolar world, including the voices of developing countries and the vast majority of under-represented regions such as Africa, Latin America and Asia Join. Bringer of peace. For this, expansion of the Council in both categories of membership is absolutely necessary.