Pakistani PM’s Kashmir rant at UNGA, crisis-hit country’s efforts to divert attention from its failures continue

The Indus border has shaped the history of India since early times. Those who invaded India through this route included the Persians, Alexander the Great, Mohammed of Ghazni, the Mongols and the Mughals and the Afghans. The British undoubtedly entered the sea route in the guise of traders, but during their stay in the subcontinent, their focus remained on the danger coming from this direction because they feared Russian invasion. However when the Japanese attacked India from the east during World War II they were caught looking in the wrong direction. After independence, the Western threat retained its primacy as Pakistan continued to suffer from its revisionist policy towards the erstwhile princely state of Jammu and Kashmir and India saw wars in 1947–48, 1965 and 1999, while the proxy war initially remained firmly in place. Stayed. Lashkar and more recently through various terrorist groups. However, the Pakistani army has been losing in all the wars fought against India.

Prime Minister of Pakistan in UNGA

There are certain constants that remain in place in Pakistan, while one is certainly the role of the military, the other is the fact that over the years the Pakistan leadership has used the UN General Assembly address as a platform to raise the Kashmir issue and attack India. Used as. This year the interim Prime Minister has not only followed through on this statement, but has sharpened the tone and expanded the scope. Addressing the general debate of the 78th session of the United Nations General Assembly, interim Prime Minister Anwar ul Haq Kakkar said Kashmir is the key to peace between Pakistan and India. He predictably emphasized that he felt Jammu and Kashmir was under illegal occupation by India. Speaking of terrorism, he noted the need to combat all terrorists without discrimination, including the growing threat posed by far-right extremist and fascist groups, such as Hindutva-inspired extremists against India’s Muslims and Christians. Threatening genocide.

today’s pakistan

Anatol Lieven, in his analysis of Pakistan in ‘A Hard Country’, wrote that it was ‘divided, disorganized, economically backward, corrupt and violent, unjust, often brutally repressive towards the poor and women, and prone to extremely dangerous forms of extremism and terrorism. The house is built. All this is unchanged, in fact it has gotten worse in the last ten years since the book was published. The Pakistani Army still remains the institution that binds the country. It does this through its constant interference in politics and foreign policy and by literally holding the levers of power. It accounts for a large share of GDP, is deeply entrenched in the economy and is largely responsible for Pakistan’s failure to develop a stable democratic system. according to the article; Pakistan Army is an institution which creates a feeling of national unity. To keep it alive, continued disruption of peace with India is paramount.